Praise For Lee And Jackson

| Uncategorized | Saturday, January 24th, 2009

Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson

Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson




January 24, 2009

By
Chuck Baldwin

January is often referred to as "Generals Month" since no less than four famous Confederate Generals claimed January as their birth month: James Longstreet (Jan. 8, 1821), Robert E. Lee (Jan. 19, 1807), Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall"Jackson(Jan. 21, 1824), and George Pickett (Jan. 28, 1825). Two of these men, Lee and Jackson, are particularly noteworthy.

Without question, Robert E. Lee and "Stonewall" Jackson were two of the greatest military leaders of all time. Even more, many military historians regard the Lee and Jackson tandem as perhaps the greatest battlefield duo in the history of warfare. If Jacksonhad survived the battle of Chancellorsville, it is very possible that the South would have prevailed atGettysburg and perhaps would even have won the War Between the States.

two of the greatest military leaders of all
time…
Confederate Generals…Robert E. Lee and "Stonewall" Jackson two of the finest Christian gentlemen…

Robert E. Lee and Thomas J. Jackson were two of the finest Christian gentlemen this country has ever produced. Both their character and their conduct were beyond reproach.

In fact, it was Lord Roberts, commander-in-chief of the British armies in the early twentieth century, who said, "In my opinion, Stonewall Jackson was one of the greatest natural military geniuses the world ever saw. I will go even further than that–as a campaigner in the field, he never had a superior. In some respects, I doubt whether he ever had an equal."

While the strategies and circumstances of the War of Northern Aggression can (and will) be debated by professionals and laymen alike, one fact is undeniable: Robert E. Lee and Thomas J. Jackson were two of the finest Christian gentlemen this country has ever produced. Both their character and their conduct were beyond reproach.

Unlike his northern counterpart, Ulysses S. Grant, General Lee never sanctioned or condoned slavery. Upon inheriting slaves from his deceased father-in-law, Lee immediately freed them. And according to historians, Jackson enjoyed a familial relationship with those few slaves that were in his home. In addition, unlike Abraham Lincoln and U.S. Grant, there is no record of either Lee or Jackson ever speaking disparagingly of the black race.

…Lincoln ’s Emancipation Proclamation did not free the slaves of the North

…Grant’s excuse for not freeing his slaves was that…

"good help is so hard to come by these days."

As those who are familiar with
history know, General Grant and his wife held personal
slaves before and during the War Between the States,
and, contrary to popular opinion, even Lincoln’s Emancipation
Proclamation did not free the slaves of the North. They
were not freed until the Thirteenth Amendment was passed
after the conclusion of the war. Grant’s excuse for not
freeing his slaves was that "good help is so hard to come by these days."

Furthermore, it is well established
thatJacksonregularly conducted a Sunday School
class for black children. This was a ministry he took
very seriously. As a result, he was dearly loved and
appreciated by the children and their parents.

In addition, both Jackson and Lee
emphatically supported the abolition of slavery. In
fact, Lee called slavery "a moral and political evil." He also said "the best men in the South" opposed it and welcomed its demise. Jackson
said he wished to see "the shackles
struck from every slave."

To think that Lee and Jackson (and
the vast majority of Confederate soldiers) would fight
and die to preserve an institution they considered evil
and abhorrent–and that they were already working to
dismantle–is the height of absurdity. It is equally
repugnant to impugn and denigrate the memory of these
remarkable Christian gentlemen.

In fact, after refusing Abraham
Lincoln’s offer to command the Union Army in 1861,
Robert E. Lee wrote to his sister on April 20 of that
year to explain his decision. In the letter he wrote, "With all my devotion to the Union and the feeling of loyalty and duty of an American citizen, I have not been able to make up my mind to
raise my hand against my relatives, my children, my home. I have therefore resigned my commission in the
army and save in defense of my native state, with the sincere hope that my poor services may never be needed . . ."

Lee’s decision to resign his commission with the Union Army must have been the most difficult decision of his life. Remember that Lee’s direct ancestors had fought in

America
’s War For Independence. His father, "Light Horse Harry" Henry Lee, was a Revolutionary War hero, Governor of Virginia, and member of Congress. In addition, members of his family were signatories to the Declaration of Independence.

Remember, too, that not only did Robert E. Lee graduate fromWest Point"at the head of his class" (according to Benjamin Hallowell), he is yet today one of only six cadets to graduate from that prestigious academy without a single demerit.

However, Lee knew that Lincoln’s decision to invade the South in order to prevent its secession was both immoral and unconstitutional. As a man of honor and integrity, the only thing Lee could do was that which his father had done: fight for freedom and independence. And that is exactly what he did.

…men of honor and moral backbone.

As a man of honor and
integrity, the only thing Lee could do was
fight for freedom and independenceAnd that is exactly what he did.

Instead of allowing a politically correct culture to sully the memory of Robert E. Lee and Thomas J. Jackson, all Americans should hold them in a place of highest honor and respect. Anything less is a disservice to history and a disgrace to the principles of truth and integrity.

Accordingly, it was more than appropriate that the late President Gerald Ford, on August 5, 1975, signed Senate Joint Resolution 23, "restoring posthumously the long overdue, full rights of citizenship to General Robert E. Lee."

According to President Ford, "This legislation
corrects a 110-year oversight of American history."
He further said, "General Lee’s character has been an example to
succeeding generations . . ."

The significance of the lives of Generals Lee and Jackson cannot be overvalued. While the character and influence of most of us will barely be remembered two hundred days after our departure, the sterling character of these men has endured for two hundred years.

What a shame that so many ofAmerica’s youth are being robbed of knowing and studying the virtue and integrity of the great General Robert E. Lee and General Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson.

Dr. Chuck Baldwin is the
pastor of Crossroad Baptist Church in Pensacola,
Florida. He hosts a
weekly radio show. His
website is
here.


    • Share/Save/Bookmark

Our African… American?? President?

| Color Of Crime | Sunday, January 18th, 2009




I know many of you have heard of the controversy concerning the citizenship status of Barack Hussein Obama II. You may have seen his Hawaiian birth certificate that has be placed before us as absolute proof beyond the shadow of a doubt that he is in fact an American.

I will present in this article information that you can verify via third party documentation. You will be able to make up your own mind.

First the birth certificate that has been presented to us by Obama is what the State Department referrers to as a “Short abstract version of a birth certificate”. This birth certificate is missing vital information. First is the signature of doctor who delivered him and the name of the hospital that cared for him. If you wanted to get a passport you could have problems with the birth certificate that Obama has presented because you cannot prove you were born in the USA with that birth certificate.

Obama's Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth

Obama's Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth

…Obama cannot prove his citizenship.

…he will hold a public office.

…the public has a right to know…

Our Immigrant Outlaw president…

Sometimes Americans are born at home, in the car, on an Indian reservation and were not attended to by a doctor or hospital. In this case you birth certificate needs to reference sworn affidavits to an individual’s witness of your birth. This at one time happened a lot but not as much as it once did.

You can get a passport with a “Short abstract version of a birth certificate” but if there is any question as to where you were born the State Department can and does from time to time request the source documents which disclose the signature of your doctor and the name of the hospital of your birth or the affidavits to your birth that will prove your American citizenship.

Mr. Obama has no reference on his birth certificate to his source documents. He will hold a public office and we have a right to see those documents. Citizenship is a requirement of the office of the president. He has no right to his so called “privacy” in this matter. Truth is we will never see them. In the same way we will never see the sealed documents on Martin Luther King because the data is so embarrassing it would unravel the power held by the leaders of civil rights aristocracy

My father was stationed in Hawaii at Schofield Barracks from 1960 – 1964. My sister was born there. This is a picture of her birth certificate. This is what Obama’s birth certificate should look like. Note that a doctors signature and hospital are both present. I agree that a private citizen should not have to open their medical records to the public. Mr. Obama will hold a public office and we have a right to that information to verify that he is in fact a legal US citizen.

Full disclosure Hawaiian birth certificate 1962

Full disclosure Hawaiian birth certificate 1962

Mr. Obama could in a moment dispel all the controversy surrounding this issue by simply stating who his doctor was and what hospital he was born in. The problem is, for whatever reason, he cannot do so because he has no source documents and therefore cannot prove his citizenship.

The state of Hawaii routinely issues Hawaiian birth certificates to people born in foreign countries and who in no way could ever be an American. On the long form (see my sister’s above) of the Hawaiian birth certificate section 7c provides for Hawaiian citizenship even if you were born in a foreign country.

The state of Hawaii itself will not accept its own birth certificate as proof of citizenship because it knows the system if saturated with errors.

This from Hawaii’s official Department of Health Vital Records web page:

A) Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country“ (applies to adopted children).

1. B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.

C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births under HRS 338-17.8. A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.

D. Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject to error. See, for example, HRS 338-17.

E. Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy of a birth certificate under HRS 338-14.3.

F. Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program. From its web site: “In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”

…the state of Hawaii itself will not accept its own birth certificate as proof of citizenship…

Obama cannot prove his citizenship if asked for the source documents. If he was actually born in Hawaii it matters not. As I stated before he holds a public office and we have a right to see those source documents. If he can be proven not qualified to hold the office of the president he can under the rule of law be removed. The problem however is that Africans in American would put to flame many American cities. Remember when Africans put 300 cities in France under the torch?? The rule of law applies only to people of no color.

We have had illegal alien outlaws voting in our elections now for 30+ years. Now an imposter, a usurper, an alien outlaw will sit in the office of the president but outrage will only be directed at those who point it out. This is poetic justice for McCain who with the traitor Ted Kennedy passed the McCain-Kennedy Immigration Bill that made all of this not only possible but reality.

The Constitution of the united States and the Bill of Rights are largely a joke at this point. On January 20, 2009 we will begin our labor under the shadow of Afro-Marxism. I will be called a racist for saying this but 20 years in a church that spewed and vomited vile racism on a daily basis now qualifies you to be president??? Yes it does… if you are a person of color.

James Coats


  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Hispanic Values Crossing The Boarder

| The Blessings of Diversity | Sunday, January 11th, 2009




Importing Domestic Violence: The Hispanic Connection

By Carl F. Horowitz

There is no word for "compromise" in Spanish, nor is there a Spanish word that captures the full meaning of the English word "dissent".

There is nothing new about physical abuse, or threats of it, in a sexual relationship. Primitive conflict-resolution techniques can wind up trumping even the most fevered declarations of love.

True Hispanic Love

(Nor is the commission of abusive acts unique to men. Respected researchers such as Donald Dutton, Richard Felson, Richard Gelles, Suzanne Steinmetz and Murray Straus  have shown that women commit unprovoked acts of violence against their male partners at least as often as vice versa.)

But the incidence of violence doesn’t just vary by personal situation. It also varies by culture. And the politically incorrect truth is that Hispanic cultures have a high propensity of substituting criminal violence for verbal facility as a way of settling disputes.

As Tufts University’s Lawrence Harrison observes: “There is no word for ‘compromise’ in Spanish, nor is there a Spanish word that captures the full meaning of the English word ‘dissent.’” This is both a cause and effect of attitudes acquired early in life.

violence doesn’t just vary by personal situation.

It also varies by culture.

Hispanic cultures have a high propensity of substituting criminal violence for verbal facility as a way of settling disputes…

There is no word for "compromise" in Spanish, nor is there a Spanish word that captures the full meaning of the English word "dissent".

But abuse is learned behavior. And learning doesn’t take place in a vacuum. In much of Hispanic culture, intimidation—not just self-defense—by males is considered honorable and thus “normal”. It’s a worldview passed on from one generation to the next.

A few years ago, Liz Claiborne Inc. commissioned Teenage Research Unlimited to conduct a national survey of American youths on their attitudes toward abuse in dating relationships.  The results, unveiled in April 2006 before a Capitol Hill audience that included Senators Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, revealed a disturbing discrepancy: Fully 13 percent of Hispanic middle- and high-school students viewed abuse as acceptable—well above the overall figure of 4 percent.

…abuse is learned behavior

And learning doesn’t take place in a vacuum.

…And it crosses borders, too.

it’s a worldview passed on from one generation to the next…

The key to combating abuse is education, according to Liz Claiborne’s then-CEO Paul R. Charron. He called for more widespread adoption of Love Is Not Abuse, a model curriculum that the company developed in 1991 and now distributes to middle- and high-school students at over 350 schools across the U.S.

Needless to say, the fact that for several decades immigration policy has been inadvertently importing such attitudes was off the table.

On one level, one can’t begrudge the importance of teaching young people about the signs of controlling and possibly lethal behavior in opposite-sex relationships. Too few people prior to adulthood (if even by then) have acquired the ability to recognize and avoid abuse.

But abuse is learned behavior. And learning doesn’t take place in a vacuum. In much of Hispanic culture, intimidation—not just self-defense—by males is considered honorable and thus “normal”. It’s a worldview passed on from one generation to the next.

And it crosses borders, too. Put simply, we are not all equally at risk

Lindsay Ann Burke was an attractive woman in her early 20s from North Kingstown, R.I. She’d fallen hard for Gerardo Martinez after meeting him at a wedding. He seemed ideal—at first. Slowly, he began limiting her contact with others, growing intensely suspicious of her motives. He incessantly called her at night, kept her from her family, and, on occasion, physically assaulted her. After two years of this, she moved in with her brother to get away from him. Her parents were especially relieved.

One day in September 2005, Lindsay’s mother, concerned when her daughter didn’t answer the phone, called police. The cops visited the Martinez residence, believing Lindsay could be there in hopes of giving the relationship one last chance.

She was there, all right—dead in a bathtub, her throat slashed. Martinez was convicted in 2007 of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without parole.

…her throat slashed.

…giving the relationship one last chance. She was there, all right …her throat slashed. Dating violence the Hispanic way…

The Rhode Island legislature, prodded by State Attorney General Patrick Lynch and Lindsay’s parents, Chris and Ann Burke—herself a health instructor—responded by passing the “Lindsay Ann Burke Act”. The law requires that all public schools incorporate the topic of dating violence into health curricula for students in the seventh through 12th grades.

This idea is set to take root elsewhere. The National Association of Attorneys General unanimously adopted a resolution this past June in support of such education. Nebraska’s top prosecutor, Jon Bruning, has announced his intention to push for legislation modeled after the Rhode Island law. Liz Claiborne Inc. and Redbook magazine are jointly promoting it.

The first state to adopt such a program was Texas in 2007. Again, it’s not hard to find Hispanic reasons. Let’s hope students there won’t grow up to be like Antonio Perez or Marcus Abrego.

Mr. Perez, a San Antonio resident, on February 11, 2007 fatally shot his wife, Teena, in the chest, and then killed himself with a bullet to his head.

A week later, Mr. Abrego, also of San Antonio, upset with something or other, dragged his girlfriend, Dolores Bibiano, up a flight of stairs, beat her, broke her spinal column, and left her for dead behind a wooden fence at the couple’s apartment. Paralyzed from the waist down, she has a slim prospect of recovery. The pair had three children, all of whom witnessed the attack. Abrego currently is awaiting trial at an unspecified date.

But it’s time to raise—forcefully and frankly– the strong possibility that certain ethnic groups have more trouble than others in adapting to our behavioral code. Empirical research beyond the horror anecdotes makes a case that, on average, Hispanics as a whole are less capable than non-Hispanic whites in handling disagreements within a sexual relationship.

 

(What these studies say about blacks is a subject for a separate article).

 

About three-fourths of these women did not report incidents, citing at least one of the following reasons: embarrassment; lack of fluency in English; fear of losing children; fear of losing income; and fear of deportation.

About that last one—in about a third of all cases, women believed that talking to police and/or health care providers would result in their removal from the U.S.

“They don’t want shelters”, she remarked. “They want to learn English. They want transportation and legal help”. Another researcher, Irma Santana, former director of South Carolina’s Hispanic Outreach, complained: “Women are not being educated…Health providers should be educating the Hispanic community that domestic violence is not permissible. It’s a crime here”. [South Carolina study: domestic violence prevalent among Hispanics, May 5, 2005]

Tena Hunt, one of the study’s principal investigators, admitted that around 95 percent of the women surveyed were “undocumented” (PC-speak for illegal). Yet that finding didn’t seem to trouble her nearly as much as the supposed inadequacy of social services targeted to their needs.

Apparently, neither Ms. Hunt nor Ms. Santana can bring themselves to understand that 95 percent of these women had also committed a crime simply by being in the U.S.

But that’s no surprise. Social services agencies and research groups are fairly stuffed with mass-immigration boosters who operate on the assumption that America has a duty to address pathologies among immigrants already here, regardless of legal status or even ability to assimilate. Immigration, by implication, is a right. 

The National Latino Alliance for the Elimination of Domestic Violence, better known as “Alianza”, is the lead organization in this area. Here, too, one finds the paradox: oppose the pathology, but not the people who inflict it.

At an April 26, 2005 luncheon at Manhattan’s Tavern on the Green, various speakers spoke of the need for Hispanic men to take a stand for healthy family environments. The ramped-up multimedia campaign, in its own words, “celebrates Latino values of community, family, passion, and compassion”, and “shows why domestic violence DOESN’T fit in Latino communities”.

But if Latinos are supposedly so steeped in warm communal values, why do they so often behave in diametrically opposite ways? Alianza doesn’t seem interested in addressing this contradiction.

What Alianza does seem interested in is expanding Latino-oriented social service delivery in this country.

Happy Hispanic Family

On October 1, 2008, to kick off Domestic Violence Month, the group called for additional funds for women’s shelters. It claimed: “Several factors, including discrimination and lack of bilingual/bicultural staff, have led to an underutilization of shelters and other domestic violence services by Latinas/os affected by domestic violence”.

This appeal, steeped in the clinical language of gender-neutral egalitarianism, implies that the main roadblock to reform is American policy—not Hispanic folkways. If only we Americans can be made to understand these folkways, goes the argument, the assimilation process would go much more smoothly.

A niche industry thus has arisen to connect Anglo and Hispanic cultures. Hispanic Research Inc., an East Brunswick, N.J.-based marketing firm, for example, offers these pearls of wisdom on its website (www.hispanic-research.com):

But why don’t Hispanic immigrants, at least those possessed of a machismo sensibility, express their longing by, well, returning home?

Even more to the point, why did they come here in the first place?

Apparently, these are not polite questions to ask at the dinner table—at least not to company founder Ricardo Lopez.

Immigration enthusiasts argue that, rather than close the gates to newcomers, we should invest more in education and other areas to promote assimilation and hence discourage domestic abuse among immigrants already here.

Yet, even without the likes of MALDEF and the National Council of La Raza promoting their noxious brew of ethnic triumphalism and separatism, these types of preventative measures work more easily in theory than in practice.

Susan Mattson and Ester Rodriguez of Arizona State University’s College of Nursing, for example, have concluded from their research on Hispanic immigrants that it is precisely in situations where one partner assimilates and the other doesn’t that the capacity for violence is greatest. The male in particular becomes prone to violence if his partner becomes aware of her legal rights and sheds the born-to-suffer fatalism of the old culture.[Intimate Partner Violence in the Latino Community and Its Effect on Children, ]

Joanne Klevens of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention admits: “Role strain, especially as a result of immigration and acculturation, might be unique to Latinos, and its importance, and the importance of male dominance among Latinas experiencing IPV [intimate partner violence], deserve more research”.[An Overview of Intimate Partner Violence Among Latinos, Klevens VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN.2007; 13: 111-122]

Let’s put this less euphemistically: America is importing domestic abuse

Education and outreach programs might mitigate some immigrant dysfunctional behavior. But greater selectivity in whom we admit to this country will accomplish this goal faster and better.

Ingrained patterns of belief and behavior don’t simply dissipate by crossing someone else’s border.

Just ask the parents of Lindsay Ann Burke.

Carl F. Horowitz (email him) is director of the Organized Labor Accountability Project of the National Legal and Policy Center in Falls Church, Va. He has a Ph.D. in urban planning and policy development.

 


  • Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (0)
Next Page »

Powered by WordPress | Theme by Roy Tanck